Exactly what changes will make 2017 Nissan Rogue various?
Lots in the pipeline, including styling up-dates and possible addition of a hybrid product. Precisely when is the question. All new with regard to model-year 2014, Rogue is due a midcycle freshening before its next full renovate, likely for 2020. If Nissan hews to the previous pace, a midcycle up-date would come for model-year 2017. It would probably involve relatively minor appearance nips as well as tucks but could also signal arrival of the hybrid. The automaker sells a gas-electric version of this compact crossover in The japanese, where it markets Rogue as the X-Trail. It won’t confirm plans for the Oughout. S., where hybrid demand is weakened right now. But company officials acknowledge tightening up emissions mandates here compel them to think about a hybrid version of the brand’s second-best-selling automobile.
Why should I wait for the 2017?
Simply to notice what’s coming. Oddly, skyrocketing demand for Fake would seem an argument against tampering with it with regard to 2017. Sales rose an astounding 44 % for calendar 2015, far outpacing development within the compact-crossover class, itself America’s fastest-growing automotive segment. Only the Honda CR-V-, Toyota RAV4, and Ford Escape outsell it. non-etheless, timing of any midcycle update for this second-generation Rogue would have already been set in place some years ago. If a ’17 revamp is unalterable, expect revisions towards the look of the nose and tail, a few new color choices, different wheel styles. New features such as full automatic braking, and perhaps even a sport-tuned model, could also be on faucet. Fuel economy is already a selling point, but the hybrid would promise even better mileage as well as answer the new-for-2016 RAV4 Hybrid.
Must i buy a 2016 model instead?
Yes, should you be attracted by its many mainstream benefits. These include an uncommonly roomy cabin as well as availability of a tiny third-row seat that meets your criteria it and the Mitsubishi Outlander as the just compact crossovers with seven-passenger capacity. An appropriate ride, good handling, and neat technologies like a bird’s-eye-view monitor are other plusses. Regrettably, a lackluster powertrain makes this one of the minimum invigorating small crossovers to drive. Still, crucial dimensions and the basic body shape won’t modify for 2017, so buying a ’16 will get you Rogue’s prime assets without struggling model-year price escalation. Also likely to come back is a core lineup consisting of the base H model, volume-selling SV, and upscale SL trims.
Will the styling be different?
If there is a midcycle freshening, it could follow a tendency that has automakers going much further than the standard modifications to grille, bumpers, and lamps. Nissan itself jumped on the bandwagon having a bolder-than-usual midcycle redo of its 2016 Altima midsize sedan. But Rouge’s 2014 redesign imbued it with many of the design cues just now making their way into other Nissans, particularly the brand’s “V-Motion” grille. Sleeker headlamps and reshaped fasciae are possible. Usually do not, however , expect this crossover to drinking water down its family-friendly mission by implementing eccentricities like the “floating-roof” appearance Nissan offered its ’16 Maxima and 2015 Murano midsize crossover. Addition of a sporty product, though, could mean aggressive-looking trim to tell apart it from other Rogues. It could even obtain 19-inch alloy wheels, in contrast to wheels established in return: 18- and 17-inch alloys within the SL and SV, respectively, and the 17-inch steel wheels with wheel covers for your S. Rogue’s cabin would benefit from much more padded surfaces, but the design is already very contemporary. Nissan won’t compromise roomy top and rear seating. And it’s prone to retain the third-row bench that’s been optionally available on the S and SV; consider it seat-belted transportation for kids in a pinch.
Any mechanical changes?
Even without styling updates – as well as barring a hybrid – we’d prefer to see an update to the only powertrain the actual nameplate has known since the first-generation bowed as a 2008 model. The 2. 5-liter 4-cylinder’s 170 horsepower and 175 pound-feet associated with torque is barely midpack for the course. But Rogue’s lackluster acceleration can be held responsible more on the conduct of its constantly variable transmission. CVTs mimic automatic feeds, but without stepped gear ratios. This responds lazily to most throttle inputs as well as allows the engine to drone intrusively as vehicle speed climbs. Nissan’s enhanced the behavior of CVTs in its other automobiles, and the ’17 Rogue would benefit from comparable attention. A sport model could conceivably have more power or specific CVT calibrations, and also firmer suspension aimed at elevating handling. Anticipate all gas versions to return with front-wheel drive as standard. About 55 % of Rogue buyers are expected to once again shell out some $1, 350 for all-wheel drive (awd). The hybrid would not become a plug-in and would likely employ a 2 . 0-liter 4-cylinder engine in combination with electric-motor assist. It might furnish significantly more power than the gas-only product, likely well over 200 horsepower and two hundred pound-feet of torque. It would be awd, as well as despite the extra weight of its lithium-ion battery power and associated hybrid hardware, it would be the fastest Rogue.
Will fuel economy enhance?
A midcycle update could bring mechanised alterations and maybe aerodynamic tweaks aimed at enhancing mileage. That’s a challenge, given Rogue’s currently laudable EPA ratings. The 2016 edition rated 26/33/28 mpg city/highway/combined with front-wheel drive and 25/32/28 with awd. Utilizing the new RAV4 Hybrid as a bogie, the Rogue hybrid would aim to exceed the rating of 34/31/33 mpg city/highway/combined.